duyn

DennisMtfg
Rookie
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Mar 2016 14:41

duyn

Unread post by DennisMtfg » 07 Jun 2020 07:56

kurt van duyn
Our assemblage engaged Mr. Kurt Van Duyn, a South African Citizen, to frame a corporate investment bond in the UK. He initially had meet references from a US link registrar, and 2 associates, so we felt he was reliable.

His stated rate was $150,000, which we paid $50,000 wire take, and $100,000 on attribution cards, so there would be a thesis trail.

Mr. Van Duyn, has a registered business function in the UK, Aggelos Peerless at Antrobus Establishment, 18 College Street, Petersfield, Hampshire, England, GU31 4AD, but was initially unable to contend against faithfulness card payments and so directed us to make the payments directly to Mr. Phillips’ law office office, in the course his website, as he did fasten on place one's faith visiting-card payments.

In utter, 19 payments were made to Mr. Phillips starting July 19th, to August 19th, 2019, the total being, $63,338. During this days, I emailed Mr. Phillips 3 times, and called and port side a declaration at his post twice, as I wanted to be confident that entire lot was correct. He not in any way got repudiate to me, and in as a matter of actual fact alone got repayment to me January 7th, 2020, via email, when I sent him an email saying I was flourishing to bitch to the Pomp Strip, and other authorities.

Mr. Philips stated in that email that Mr. Van Duyn was his patient, and he had been instructed not to state to me at near his client. (Mr. Van Duyn is a prior Any Prosecutor from South Africa, and at the present time is in fiscal services) and that he, Mr. Phillips, had no feeling what I was talking surrounding and that as undoubtedly as he knew, the payments were for apropos diligence on a mineral project. Mr. Phillips is a close wound lawyer and this whodunit makes no sense. If we were paying him over the extent of unpaid diligence, we would have been his client.

In Oct 2019, after we had tried numerous times to struggle and stumble on missing what was affluent on, Mr. Van Duyn alert to us that our assignment was not contemporary forward.

We had been told from the start that the cement was pre-sold to Mr. Van Duyn and his investors. As this went along, and nothing at all times materialized, the myth kept changing, and became a falsehood close to a billion dollar apportion they were getting paid from, which would then be familiar to support the pact, which is NOT pre-sold signification funds were close by as soon as the legitimate construction of the connection was finished.
rippoff report
van duyn
van duyn

Aggelos Capital Limited
kurt
kurt

This was all done AFTER we had paid him, and we have the courage of one's convictions pretend our scratch was acclimatized for a “trading program” that was a scam. We asked to observe well-earned diligence on the “investor” but were ignored, until at the end of the day in touch that the invent was insensible in October 2019. Mr. Van Duyn to on the 5th of December, to refund the amount in total on January 6th, then nothing happened.

We do grasp that Mr. Phillips was working in consort with Mr. Van Duyn, and his refusal to answer until being informed of actions against him, is suspicious. I was told by means of Mr. Van Duyn, that Mr. Phillips did take a recompense, for the treatment of his participation, and wired the go to Mr. Van Duyn offshore. I don’t sight how a US personal abuse lawyer has any dominion concluded being gifted to buy with our registered engagement in the UK. I also don’t cognizant of the compass of trade the two of them had/have, as they would not debauch this information. Mr. Phillips took $63,338 of our lolly, for something he claims he knows nothing far, and wired it offshore to a artful enterprise.

A gripe has been filed with the Land Bar-room of Maryland against Mr. Phillips, and as ok a beef has been filed against Mr. Van Duyn with the FCA in the UK, as he violated a variety of items with his fraudulent practices.
Attachments
129.gif
129.gif (3.54 KiB) Viewed 2361 times

Post Reply