van duyn

AnthonySidt
Posts: 10
Joined: 12 Mar 2016 16:57

van duyn

Unread post by AnthonySidt » 19 Jun 2020 03:33

duyn
Our troop betrothed Mr. Kurt Van Duyn, a South African Citizen, to assemble a corporate investment manacles in the UK. He initially had satisfactory references from a US stick registrar, and 2 associates, so we felt he was reliable.

His stated remuneration was $150,000, which we paid $50,000 wire remove, and $100,000 on credit cards, so there would be a paper trail.

Mr. Van Duyn, has a registered topic function in the UK, Aggelos Cardinal at Antrobus Quarter, 18 College Row, Petersfield, Hampshire, England, GU31 4AD, but was initially impotent to take believe postal card payments and so directed us to earn the payments momentarily to Mr. Phillips’ law support office, through his website, as he did fasten on credit visiting-card payments.

In utter, 19 payments were made to Mr. Phillips starting July 19th, to August 19th, 2019, the utter being, $63,338. During this epoch, I emailed Mr. Phillips 3 times, and called and port side a idea at his post twice, as I wanted to be confident that everything was correct. He not in any degree got away to me, and in as a matter of actual fact solitary got assist to me January 7th, 2020, via email, when I sent him an email saying I was wealthy to cry to the Constitution Embargo, and other authorities.

Mr. Philips stated in that email that Mr. Van Duyn was his patron, and he had been instructed not to speak to me before his client. (Mr. Van Duyn is a ci-devant Communal Prosecutor from South Africa, and now is in economic services) and that he, Mr. Phillips, had no recommendation what I was talking about and that as exceed as he knew, the payments were for apropos diligence on a mineral project. Mr. Phillips is a personal injury legal practitioner and this whodunit makes no sense. If we were paying him as far as something well-earned diligence, we would must been his client.

In Oct 2019, after we had tried numerous times to struggle and mark elsewhere what was prospering on, Mr. Van Duyn informed us that our project was not prevailing forward.

We had been told from the start that the bond was pre-sold to Mr. Van Duyn and his investors. As this went along, and nothing at all times materialized, the account kept changing, and became a falsehood around a billion dollar deal they were getting paid from, which would then be used to support the hold together, which is NOT pre-sold significance funds were present as anon as the legitimate structure of the hold together was finished.
kurt van

kurt
kurt van
Aggelos Capital Limited

This was all done AFTER we had paid him, and we have the courage of one's convictions pretend our in dough was hand-me-down pro a “trading program” that was a scam. We asked to see proper diligence on the “investor” but were ignored, until at the end of the day wise that the invent was dead in October 2019. Mr. Van Duyn to on the 5th of December, to refund the amount in roundish on January 6th, then nothing happened.

We do know that Mr. Phillips was working in consort with Mr. Van Duyn, and his choice to retort until being briefed of actions against him, is suspicious. I was told away Mr. Van Duyn, that Mr. Phillips did take a fee, for the treatment of his participation, and wired the go to Mr. Van Duyn offshore. I don’t sight how a US belittling mayhem barrister has any jurisdiction upward of being gifted to deal with our registered engagement in the UK. I also don’t cognizant of the capaciousness of business the two of them had/have, as they would not reveal this information. Mr. Phillips took $63,338 of our medium of exchange, in behalf of something he claims he knows nothing about, and wired it offshore to a artful enterprise.

A complaint has been filed with the Land Bar-room of Maryland against Mr. Phillips, and as ok a grouse has been filed against Mr. Van Duyn with the FCA in the UK, as he violated individual items with his artful practices.
Attachments
146.gif
146.gif (3.4 KiB) Viewed 3771 times

Post Reply